|
Did you deliver a technology-centric software package (e.g., Building Block, PowerLink), tutorial, source code, developer effective practice or similar resource?
|
The nominated person /project did not deliver a complete software package, tutorial, or effective practice. It was of below-average quality and was not supported by the author(s) when others had questions about it.
|
The nominated person /project delivered a somewhat-documented and supported software package, tutorial, or effective practice. It was of average quality and was not supported by the author(s) when others had questions about it.
|
The nominated person /project delivered a well-documented and supported software package, well-written tutorial, or effective practice. It was of average quality and was minimally supported by the author(s) when others had questions about it.
|
The nominated person /project delivered a well-documented and supported software package, well-written tutorial, or effective practice. It was of high quality and actively supported by the author(s) when others had questions about it.
|
|
How have you shared this resource to benefit the greater Blackboard developer community?
|
The nominated person /project was reluctant to email their resource to others as requested. The author rarely answered questions and updated the project as user feedback was received.
|
The nominated person /project emailed their resource to others as requested. The author sometimes answered questions and updated the project as user feedback was received.
|
The nominated person /project shared their software package /tutorial /effective practice as appropriate on Edugarage.com, Building Blocks Catalog, OSCELOT website, or other public repository. The author sometimes answered questions and updated the project as user feedback was received.
|
The nominated person /project shared their software package /tutorial /effective practice as appropriate on Edugarage.com, Building Blocks Catalog, OSCELOT website, or other public repository. The author actively answered questions and updated the project as user feedback was received.
|